Sat. Sep 18th, 2021

A total of 516,000 hectares have been distributed among 405,800 farmers nationwide by the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) under the administration of President Rodrigo Duterte.

During the President’s Talk to the People on Monday night, Secretary John Castriciones said on several occasions, Duterte himself led the distribution.

(photo courtesy: http://www.cnn.ph)

President Duterte attended the distribution of Certificates of Land Ownership Award (CLOA) in Kidapawan City, Cotabato on Dec. 29, 2018, covering 11,443 hectares for more than 6,000 beneficiaries.

Duterte was also in General Santos City on June 13, 2019 when more than 20,000 hectares of agricultural land were given in a region-wide distribution done in one day.

Castriciones said nothing came easy as problems hounded the agency at the onset of the Duterte administration

First, the remaining hectares of land that can be distributed was at 548,564 hectares only. Moreover, many of these are problematic land holdings with pending cases, not to mention that the issuance of notice of coverage ended in 2014,” Castriciones said partly in Filipino.

More than 50,000 cases were pending before the DAR Adjudication Board (DARAB) about the Agrarian Law implementation, leading to numerous protests by farmers.

Castriciones said cases under DARAB were caused by disagreements between landowners and farmers, while those under the category of the Agrarian Law implementation involved lack of detailed guidelines.

“Third, the collective CLOA involving 1.3 million hectares of land distributed during past administrations affecting 1.1 million agrarian reform beneficiaries were already existing when the Duterte administration came in,” he said partly in Filipino.

Castriciones said the collective CLOA caused problems for farmers because they could not identify which part of the land they actually own.

As a result, they could not pay for their land amortization with the Land Bank of the Philippines as they could not identify what is theirs.

They also did not have individual titles that they could use as collateral in case they need to avail of services by financial institutions.

“And on the part of the local government, they were unable to collect real property taxes from the farmers. Because of these problems, it is not surprising that the agricultural sector remained the poorest in our society,” Castriciones said partly in Filipino.

Leave a Reply